![]() (Note that the aircraft's coordinate system is rotated 180 degrees compared to the standard in this case, more or less due to a mistake during the creation of the 3d model - it is more work than it is worth to rotate everything in my blender file. The instrument panel file is then included and positioned in the aircraft's coordinate system by. That will save you a lot of grief if it turns out that you need to move the instrument panel later. That way you can essentially position the instruments in 2 dimensions and then position the instrument panel XML file properly in the aircraft. I would recommend that you create an XML file representing the instrument panel and include the instruments in this file. ![]() In the above example our 0 start point is 35 degrees rotation, the second 50 is a further 80degrees rotation through to our finish point at max 140 is a further 190 degrees rotation from the one shown prior.Ī typical inclusion of an instrument looks something like this:Īircraft/Short_Empire/Instruments/Altimeter/altimeter.xml The interpolation shows the relationship between readings. If your instruments is facing you and is vertical, then to lay it on its back fully horizontal the pitch-deg would be -90, you can see in this example it has a -65 deg pitch. The offsets show at what location we are animating the object. In the tach.ac model the "needle" is called the TurbineNeedle A victory is only worth as much as your heart puts in.The path is obviously the path to the instrument you are placing. Casualties are a necessary part of war, you can't really gain anything if you aren't willing to risk anything. ![]() Hence, we are looking at the sad outlook of having computers and drones do out fighting for us. So, while the F-35 is not suited well for dogfighting, the age of dogfighting is long dead now, even missile toting pseudo-dogfighting included. Su-37, S-37), they do not have the ability to mass produce this level of aircraft. While Russian tech has shown a lot of promise in making astounding air to air aircraft (i.e. Also, on the topic of less likely, I don't believe it is likely that another nations air force will become strong enough or a threat in the next 20 or so years. to the F-35 would be much more costly and complicated, and therefore less likely to happen. Unlike the later addition of a gunto the F-4, the addition of thrust vectoring, etc. F-35 Cockpit Screens and Displays Full Tutorial F-35 Is Incredible Microsoft Flight Simulator XboxJoin the Fast Times Vero Discord. One shot, one kill is an impossible assumption to make in air to air combat. The military statement on why this was, is that the F-35 does not need to be more maneuverable than an F-16, as it is intended to fly in undetected, and use its advanced weapon systems to one shot, one kill. I made the assumption of "not intended to dogfight," based on the lack of inclusion of newer, more advanced flight characteristics, and thrust vectoring. I understand them not installing one on the Stovl version, but I believe there is already a gun thread on this board, so I'm done talking about that. ![]() I agree with most people here, in that I really wish they would include a gun on the CV variant. I understand what I made was an assumption, but it is also an assumption the Pentagon is taking. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |